\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Wait, this is the holding of Wong Kim Ark??

United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), is a lan...
Bateful pozpig friendly grandma
  12/08/25
I'm sure Trump's executive order is sufficient to get it ove...
Comical striped hyena
  12/08/25
You know how
Histrionic Cumskin Garrison
  12/08/25
hey buddy that phrase is straight out of the ADLs Dictionary...
Bateful pozpig friendly grandma
  12/08/25
imagine having such strong opinions about the law here but r...
awkward thriller tanning salon community account
  12/08/25
I don't have to imagine.
Bateful pozpig friendly grandma
  12/08/25
...
awkward thriller tanning salon community account
  12/08/25
180
Pale roommate organic girlfriend
  12/09/25
...
bossy autistic quadroon site
  12/09/25
correct
Lemon Exhilarant Turdskin
  12/09/25
...
Biglaw partner throwin' ya some overtime
  06/18/26


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:37 PM
Author: Bateful pozpig friendly grandma

United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), is a landmark decision[2] of the U.S. Supreme Court which held that "a child born in the United States, of parents of Chinese descent, who, at the time of his birth, are subjects of the Emperor of China, but have a permanent domicile and residence in the United States, and are there carrying on business, and are not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity under the Emperor of China", automatically became a U.S. citizen at birth.[3]

Seems like a salient factor that WKA's parents "have a permanent domicile and residence in the united states and are there carrying on business"?

How does this turn into "who, at the time of his birth, entered the country illegally and committed a crime in entering"?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2#49495681)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:38 PM
Author: Comical striped hyena

I'm sure Trump's executive order is sufficient to get it overturned

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2#49495682)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:38 PM
Author: Histrionic Cumskin Garrison

You know how

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2#49495683)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:40 PM
Author: Bateful pozpig friendly grandma

hey buddy that phrase is straight out of the ADLs Dictionary of Hate

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2#49495687)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:39 PM
Author: awkward thriller tanning salon community account

imagine having such strong opinions about the law here but reading just now for the first tkme a portion of the wikipedia entry

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2#49495686)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:40 PM
Author: Bateful pozpig friendly grandma

I don't have to imagine.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2#49495688)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:42 PM
Author: awkward thriller tanning salon community account



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2#49495693)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 9th, 2025 1:00 AM
Author: Pale roommate organic girlfriend

180

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2#49495787)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 9th, 2025 2:08 AM
Author: bossy autistic quadroon site



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2#49495839)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 9th, 2025 12:52 AM
Author: Lemon Exhilarant Turdskin

correct

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2#49495777)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 18th, 2026 11:58 AM
Author: Biglaw partner throwin' ya some overtime



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2#49946265)