it has always creeped me out how everyone else here acts like he's some kind of silly comic relief mascot or something and not a 100% evil worthless piece of shit

he has literally zero redeeming qualities as a life form. even someone like CSLG admittedly has a few redeeming qualities of worth. tommy turdskin has *nothing*. just a black hole of pure entropy and evil

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870538&forum_id=2#49910830)

Obviously I would never want anything to do with him and he's a terrible person, but I am also willing to be honest about him and about everyone else. "Tommy Turdskin" has literally zero positive qualities. He's a black hole of worthlessness and evil

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870538&forum_id=2#49911120)

Evil is disco fries not taking ozempic because of his ego and being willing to die at 45 while his children have to watch (which is why most of us for our sanity assume it's schtick). Short of any extremely obvious examples like that it's just moralizing your personal distaste for his poasting

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870538&forum_id=2#49910959)

but i think you mostly nailed it with the first sentence

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870538&forum_id=2#49911020)

this was "boner police"s m.o. as well

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870538&forum_id=2#49911085)

karlstack is scamilio's goon and scamilio's "israel" is a "nation" of parasitic fraudsters hiding behind rote ritual purity and outright word game scamming/entrapment

the guy's a fucking crook and so is karlshit

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870538&forum_id=2#49911008)

yes.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870538&forum_id=2#49911065)

but i don't really think tommy is a bad guy and i am not offended or bothered by his talk about whites at all so long as it's allowed to be reciprocal

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870538&forum_id=2#49911288)

Author: Only sane guy in the room

these accounts are both false flagging to make it look like 1. the primary source of the disputes is racism and that 2. racism is the main topic that was being discussed here prior (before the jewish crook circus came to town)

this was "boner police"s m.o. as well

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870538&forum_id=2#49911086)

Ur not smart and you are a bad writer

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870538&forum_id=2#49911111)

layer 1: he's an anti-white bigot

layer 2: he's a clown comic relief doing shtick

layer 3: he's totally disconnected from the world in almost every respect, disillusioned, no family or friends or work, just xo

layer 4: on some level he understands layer 1, 2, and 3, and continues to post with the meta-knowledge

layer 4 is where he really shines and separates himself from the rifraf. this is why he embraces the criticisms and doesn't get offended by anything. he's really great

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870538&forum_id=2#49911129)

Karl is very black and white, it’s part of his charm. When he bombed Econ OCI he (rightly probably) saw it as an injustice instead of accepting it. Hence the long road from Rufo, shitting on academic DEI, to whatever it is he’s doing now. It’s a very Canadian, Dudley Doright approach.

Thomas sees the world for what it is and has no interest in change, or calling out “injustice,” or any of that. His worldview is more cynical, third-world (and accurate I’d say, but whatever). Thomas sees no issue in mocking the death of a white guy on a bort where other white guys call him “Turdskin.” I can’t say I blame him but I do agree such cynicism is a little sad.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870538&forum_id=2#49911419)