The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
got a 180 business plan I'm ironing out with some doods in my Whatsapp group
| soul-stirring hall | 05/19/26 |
| 180 Saffron Stage Sandwich | 05/19/26 |
| sooty pozpig | 05/20/26 |
| soul-stirring hall | 05/19/26 |
| cordovan cuck brunch | 05/20/26 |
| soul-stirring hall | 05/20/26 |
| soul-stirring hall | 05/20/26 |
| sooty pozpig | 05/20/26 |
| soul-stirring hall | 05/20/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: May 19th, 2026 11:41 PM Author: soul-stirring hall turns out these people don't know shit about law firms and how they're using AI. There's a hot opportunity for the right set of entrepreneurs to bust this open, but they'd need at least one lawyer on board to pitch it. Totally different business model than anyone has right now. Totally different product. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5867602&forum_id=2#49891110) |
Date: May 19th, 2026 11:46 PM Author: 180 Saffron Stage Sandwich thought this would be a FLW thread but i think this guy is serious (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5867602&forum_id=2#49891121) |
 |
Date: May 20th, 2026 8:50 AM Author: sooty pozpig (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5867602&forum_id=2#49891382) |
|
Date: May 19th, 2026 11:49 PM Author: soul-stirring hall Rule #1: anyone who says they've "solved" hallucination is full of shit. They haven't solved shit.
Rule #2: the model only has to hallucinate once for the customer to realize you're full of shit, and you didn't solve shit. Their faith in you is shattered.
So this isn't really about that. If you ask this thing to do a 50-state survey, don't expect results you can take to the bank. But also don't expect that from ChatGPT or Claude. They're all going to fuck you in the ass if you put them on autopilot.
This is more about unlocking features they can't offer. Making promises they can't make. The support contracts will be easy as fuck to manage. Nothing is vibe coded and everything is vibe coded at the same time. |
|
Date: May 20th, 2026 12:04 AM Author: cordovan cuck brunch as a lawyer, i don't care about hallucinations. i want ai that can look at all the documents, make generally good suggestions that i can incorporate or not, and serve as another guard against misses (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5867602&forum_id=2#49891141) |
|
Date: May 20th, 2026 12:10 AM Author: soul-stirring hall yes. Neal Katyal's AI is also not very useful to most lawyers, because most of us are not doing oral args before appellate judges. Individual lawyers need help with the specific shit that they do. They have their way of doing things. They know the law well enough to notice when AI's hallucinate or just plain get shit wrong. You got show em something they haven't seen yet. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5867602&forum_id=2#49891144) |
|
Date: May 20th, 2026 12:01 AM Author: soul-stirring hall Rule #3: jewish developers and venture capitalists who know nothing about how lawyers think are nonetheless ready to learn. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5867602&forum_id=2#49891139) |
|
Date: May 20th, 2026 8:51 AM Author: sooty pozpig I currently get about 20 spam emails a day breathlessly promising the next AI frontier in law (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5867602&forum_id=2#49891383) |
|
Date: May 20th, 2026 6:55 PM Author: soul-stirring hall And you disregard them because you already use AI and you know its strengths and weaknesses. You can't be persuaded that any of these platforms will outperform whatever you're already using. You know they all hallucinate and give canned answers based on stale training data.
Furthermore usage costs are mooning. You might be paying $300/mo right now, but six months from now that cost could triple as these datacenters scramble to turn a profit. How can you mitigate the uncertainty? Talk to NSAM. |