\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Law Professors Prefer AI Over Peer Answers

https://law.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/salinas_...
Bronze digit ratio gaping
  06/02/26
llm's are pretty good at legal stuff. thete's gonna be a flo...
titillating native depressive
  06/02/26
...
Yellow Deranged Cruise Ship Idiot
  06/02/26
I think filing fees will largely prevent that, but I agree t...
Bronze digit ratio gaping
  06/02/26
a $500 filing fee isnt going to prevent normie litigation wh...
Abnormal stag film macaca
  06/02/26
Which LLMs? ChatGPT has been dead fucking wrong about multip...
Flickering red ceo den
  06/02/26
Hey, 1Ls, no need for office hours. Just ask AI.
Bronze digit ratio gaping
  06/02/26
Law professors prefer JDs over LLMs, the study added.
Abnormal stag film macaca
  06/02/26
...
pink impertinent quadroon internal respiration
  06/03/26
What "questions" could a law professor possibly ne...
Yapping Scarlet Striped Hyena
  06/02/26
...
Yellow Deranged Cruise Ship Idiot
  06/02/26
...
pink impertinent quadroon internal respiration
  06/03/26
This is a dumb study with a predictable result. They're ...
Thirsty Potus
  06/02/26


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: June 2nd, 2026 5:12 PM
Author: Bronze digit ratio gaping

https://law.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/salinas_et_al.pdf

"Professors rated LLMs far higher than their peers (average win rate = 75.33%), with models performing similarly to the best instructor. LLM responses were also rarely flagged as harmful (3.53%, vs 12.06% for professors). Preferences for LLM answers were consistent across evaluators and reflected shared professional standards."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870655&forum_id=2#49911519)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 2nd, 2026 5:32 PM
Author: titillating native depressive

llm's are pretty good at legal stuff. thete's gonna be a flood of litigation as normies and proles realize a $20 claude subscription can produce at least as good of results as a $200/hr shitlaw attorney who doesn't return their calls.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870655&forum_id=2#49911539)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 2nd, 2026 5:39 PM
Author: Yellow Deranged Cruise Ship Idiot



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870655&forum_id=2#49911544)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 2nd, 2026 5:40 PM
Author: Bronze digit ratio gaping

I think filing fees will largely prevent that, but I agree that AI can do a pretty good job with basic drafting tasks. It can definitely analyze typical consumer dispute documents and create a competent complaint.

IME, the public AI tools aren't very good with legal research and citations, but a lot of cases don't require much of that. They also aren't particularly good with strategy and argument judgment. But competent drafting is typically more important than either of those for the normie litigation you're talking about.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870655&forum_id=2#49911546)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 2nd, 2026 5:43 PM
Author: Abnormal stag film macaca

a $500 filing fee isnt going to prevent normie litigation where stakes are high enough, such as some prole homeowner vs. a house contractor over a $30k kitchen reno

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870655&forum_id=2#49911551)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 2nd, 2026 8:08 PM
Author: Flickering red ceo den

Which LLMs? ChatGPT has been dead fucking wrong about multiple legal questions I've asked it

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870655&forum_id=2#49911904)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 2nd, 2026 5:17 PM
Author: Bronze digit ratio gaping

Hey, 1Ls, no need for office hours. Just ask AI.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870655&forum_id=2#49911521)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 2nd, 2026 5:31 PM
Author: Abnormal stag film macaca

Law professors prefer JDs over LLMs, the study added.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870655&forum_id=2#49911536)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 3rd, 2026 11:33 AM
Author: pink impertinent quadroon internal respiration



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870655&forum_id=2#49912733)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 2nd, 2026 5:44 PM
Author: Yapping Scarlet Striped Hyena

What "questions" could a law professor possibly need the answer to? Should I go to Greece or Spain for my next sabbatical?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870655&forum_id=2#49911554)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 2nd, 2026 5:49 PM
Author: Yellow Deranged Cruise Ship Idiot



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870655&forum_id=2#49911563)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 3rd, 2026 11:33 AM
Author: pink impertinent quadroon internal respiration



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870655&forum_id=2#49912734)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 2nd, 2026 8:07 PM
Author: Thirsty Potus

This is a dumb study with a predictable result.

They're essentially taking popular 1L cases taught first year law students, and asking professors and LLMs to explain them.

Predictably, the LLMS did better because they can just summarize the casebooks from the past 40 years in the most concise way.

But let's say we a ran a study, where we compared the explanations in the study guide vs the explanations of professors, and other professors chose the study guide 75% of the time. Would that be meaningful or surprising?

I wouldn't think so...

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870655&forum_id=2#49911897)