The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Judaism is utter flame
Poast new message in this thread
Date: September 14th, 2012 12:05 AM Author: Chartreuse curious property shitlib The Torah was written during the Babylonian Captivity. There is zero archaeological evidence that Jews were ever in Egypt. Abraham and Moses never existed. There is no Promised Land. It's just fertile crescent Manifest Destiny. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2052001&forum_id=2#21575116) |
 |
Date: September 14th, 2012 12:06 AM Author: effete stain shhhhhhhhhhhh! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2052001&forum_id=2#21575122) |
|
Date: September 14th, 2012 12:10 AM Author: Seedy sooty university Jews were the hyksos breh. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2052001&forum_id=2#21575152) |
Date: September 14th, 2012 12:07 AM Author: slimy resort Yeah, I read about that recently. It's sorta like an ideal and invented story for purposes of the time. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2052001&forum_id=2#21575128) |
|
Date: September 14th, 2012 12:07 AM Author: bat shit crazy high-end gas station kitty ashkenazi jews are descended from khazars, who are not semetic. lol at "anti-semitism." (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2052001&forum_id=2#21575135) |
|
Date: September 14th, 2012 12:09 AM Author: Seedy sooty university OP is 100% legit, but Khazar theory is complete flame.
|
|
Date: September 14th, 2012 12:10 AM Author: abusive pozpig chad cr (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2052001&forum_id=2#21575153) |
|
Date: September 14th, 2012 12:18 AM Author: Up-to-no-good buff prole kitchen from what point does the old testament start being legit history? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2052001&forum_id=2#21575226) |
|
Date: September 14th, 2012 12:21 AM Author: Seedy sooty university it's never completely made up, nor is it ever 100% legit. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2052001&forum_id=2#21575265) |
|
Date: September 14th, 2012 12:22 AM Author: Up-to-no-good buff prole kitchen I think Ruth was the first legit book since it was so down to earth and erotic. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2052001&forum_id=2#21575284) |
|
Date: September 14th, 2012 12:39 AM Author: Chartreuse curious property shitlib I wouldn't trust anything before the Babylonian Captivity. There's no evidence that the judges or kings existed, and prophecy basically stops after Ezekiel, which augurs well for historical accuracy. Ezra-Nehemiah would be the book about this time. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2052001&forum_id=2#21575486) |
|
Date: September 14th, 2012 12:22 AM Author: bat shit crazy high-end gas station kitty how is it flame? I'm just curious, i don't have an opinion either way. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2052001&forum_id=2#21575281) |
|
Date: September 14th, 2012 12:36 AM Author: Up-to-no-good buff prole kitchen weren't the khazars, mongol types? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2052001&forum_id=2#21575431) |
|
Date: September 14th, 2012 12:37 AM Author: abusive pozpig chad genetic testing has shown that while there is some khazar blood mixed in to the group, most ashkenasic jews are at least partly descended from israelite types (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2052001&forum_id=2#21575442) |
|
Date: September 14th, 2012 12:40 AM Author: Up-to-no-good buff prole kitchen In August 2012, a thorough genetic study which applied a wide range of population genetic analyses (principal component, biogeographical origin, admixture, identity by descent, allele sharing distance, and uniparental analyses) concluded that "our findings support the Khazarian Hypothesis and portray the European Jewish genome as a mosaic of Caucasus, European, and Semitic ancestries, thereby consolidating previous contradictory reports of Jewish ancestry"[ (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2052001&forum_id=2#21575506) |
|
Date: September 14th, 2012 12:21 AM Author: Soul-stirring territorial casino No shit. But it codified two inconsistent strands of tradition. Landowners had the Abraham story as their claim to Israel. The preistly class had the exodus story. The bible was written to connect the two and satisfy them both.
Of course this nullifies all the abrahmic religions. Perhaps Islam can stand but probably not. |
|
Date: September 14th, 2012 12:22 AM Author: slimy resort I remember when I was like 6 years old thinking, "they probably made this shit up for practical reasons" (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2052001&forum_id=2#21575279) |
|
Date: September 14th, 2012 12:37 AM Author: Red Hell (Guy who actually knows his shit) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2052001&forum_id=2#21575458) |
|
Date: April 15th, 2026 4:47 AM Author: Marinating in Retards (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2052001&forum_id=2#49818592) |
|
Date: September 14th, 2012 12:22 AM Author: abusive pozpig chad There's no real difference between this and the zionist industry of trying to claim that there's "no such thing as a palestinian." All these identities are ultimately constructed to some extent regardless of whatever slivers of historical foundation there are. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2052001&forum_id=2#21575280) |