\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Wait, this is the holding of Wong Kim Ark??

United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), is a lan...
alcoholic theatre friendly grandma
  12/08/25
I'm sure Trump's executive order is sufficient to get it ove...
avocado cerebral crackhouse police squad
  12/08/25
You know how
Embarrassed to the bone national
  12/08/25
hey buddy that phrase is straight out of the ADLs Dictionary...
alcoholic theatre friendly grandma
  12/08/25
imagine having such strong opinions about the law here but r...
Hideous awkward dopamine
  12/08/25
I don't have to imagine.
alcoholic theatre friendly grandma
  12/08/25
...
Hideous awkward dopamine
  12/08/25
180
splenetic tank
  12/09/25
...
duck-like thriller depressive
  12/09/25
correct
Bonkers chrome temple
  12/09/25
...
Biglaw partner throwin' ya some overtime
  06/18/26


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:37 PM
Author: alcoholic theatre friendly grandma

United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), is a landmark decision[2] of the U.S. Supreme Court which held that "a child born in the United States, of parents of Chinese descent, who, at the time of his birth, are subjects of the Emperor of China, but have a permanent domicile and residence in the United States, and are there carrying on business, and are not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity under the Emperor of China", automatically became a U.S. citizen at birth.[3]

Seems like a salient factor that WKA's parents "have a permanent domicile and residence in the united states and are there carrying on business"?

How does this turn into "who, at the time of his birth, entered the country illegally and committed a crime in entering"?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2#49495681)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:38 PM
Author: avocado cerebral crackhouse police squad

I'm sure Trump's executive order is sufficient to get it overturned

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2#49495682)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:38 PM
Author: Embarrassed to the bone national

You know how

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2#49495683)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:40 PM
Author: alcoholic theatre friendly grandma

hey buddy that phrase is straight out of the ADLs Dictionary of Hate

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2#49495687)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:39 PM
Author: Hideous awkward dopamine

imagine having such strong opinions about the law here but reading just now for the first tkme a portion of the wikipedia entry

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2#49495686)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:40 PM
Author: alcoholic theatre friendly grandma

I don't have to imagine.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2#49495688)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:42 PM
Author: Hideous awkward dopamine



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2#49495693)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 9th, 2025 1:00 AM
Author: splenetic tank

180

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2#49495787)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 9th, 2025 2:08 AM
Author: duck-like thriller depressive



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2#49495839)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 9th, 2025 12:52 AM
Author: Bonkers chrome temple

correct

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2#49495777)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 18th, 2026 11:58 AM
Author: Biglaw partner throwin' ya some overtime



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2#49946265)